Stream System Issues (101, 102, 103, 104 & RN-97-2413)

RN-97-2413; Claims of the Estate of Nathan Boyd

Entry of Appearance and Request for Notice – Thomas K. Snodgrass; filed 4-13-17

Mandate and Opinion from COA- Filed 6-19-2015

Mandate and Opinion of the Court of Appeals; 6-19-15nb

Order on Motion for Rehearing- Filed 11-17-2014

Order on Motion for Rehearing (motion for rehearing denied); 11-17-14;nb

Motion for Permission to Exceed Page Limits in Reply Brief; filed 7-11-13nb

Amended Motion for Permission to Exceed Page Limits in Reply Brief; filed 7-11-13nb

Motion for Leave to Extend Time for Filing Reply Brief; filed 6-24-13nb

Corrected Motion for Leave t Exceed Page or Word Limitation of Brief and to Extend Time for Filing Brief; filed 3-14-13nb

Motion for Leave to Exceed Page or Word Limitation of Brief and to Extend Time for Filing Brief; filed 3-13-13nb

Transmittal Letter; filed 1-23-13nb

Certificate of Mailing; filed 1-23-13nb

Notice of Filing Transcript on Appeal; filed 1-7-13nb

Certificate of Satisfactory Arrangement-DiGregorio; filed 12-18-12nb

Certificate of Satisfactory Arrangement-Rubino; filed 12-18-12nb

Designation of Transcript of Proceedings on Appeal; filed 11-20-12nb

Third Motion to Amend Record Proper; filed 11-7-12nb

Notice of Nondesignation of Transcript; filed 11-7-12nb

Motion and ORDER on Second Motion to Amend the Record Proper; filed 10-15-12nb

Notice of Assignment to the General Calendar; 9-21-12;nb

Clerk’s Certificate; filed 7-6-12nb

Transmittal Letter; filed 7-6-12nb

Certificate of Costs; 7-6-12;nb

Docketing Statement (COA filed on 5-14-12); 7-5-12;nb

Notice of Withdrawal of Attorney for EBID-Beverly J. Singleman; filed 5-31-12nb

Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration; 4-20-12;nb

Order Denying EBID’s Motion to Strike and for Attorney Fees; 4-13-12;nb

Notice of Appeal; 4-6-12;nb

EBID’s Response and Motion to Strike Boyd Estate’s Motion to Reconsider the Court’s 2-14-12 Order Granting the US’, EBID’s and the City of Las Cruces’ Motions to Dismiss the Claims of the Estate of Nathan Boyd and for Attorney Fees; 3-13-12;nb

Motion Reconsider the Order Dated 2-24-12 Granting the US, OSE, EBID and City of Las Cruces’ Motions to Dismiss Estate of Nathan Boyd; 3-6-12;nb

Order Granting (1) the US’ and EBID’s and (2) The City of Las Cruces’ Motons to Dismiss the Claims of the Estate of Nathan Boyd; 2-24-12nb

Movant Boyd’s Reply to the US, EBID and Las Cruces’ Response in Support of His Motion for Leave to Clarify and Correct the Record; 10-26-11;nb

Boyd’s Motion for an Extension of Time to file a Reply to the US, EBID and Las Cruces’ Response to Boyd’s Motion for Leave to Clarify and Correct the Record; 10-26-11;nb

City of Las Cruces’ Response to Boyd Motion for Leave to Clarify and Correct the Record; 9-10-11;nb

City of Las Cruces’ Motion for Leave to File a Response to Boyd Motion for Leave to Clarify and Correct the Record; 9-20-11;nb

Notice of Errata for US’ and EBID’s Reply to the Boyd Motion for Leave to Clarify and Correct the Record; 9-14-11;nb

Order Granting City of Las Cruces’ Motion for Leave to File Response to Boyd Motion for Leave to Clarify and Correct the Record and Further Granting Such Leave for Other Parties to this Proceeding; 9-22-11;nb

US’ and EBID’s Reply to the Boyd Motion for Leave to Clarify and Correct the Record; 9-12-11;nb

Motion for Leave to Clarify and Correct the Record; 8-26-11;nb

City of Las Cruces’ Reply to the Boyd Response to the Motion to Dismiss Submitted by the US, EBID, Las Cruces and the Responses of the State of New Mexico’s and NMSU’s EBID’s Support of the Motions to Dismiss; 8-01-11;nb

US’ and EBID’s Reply to the Boyd Response to Motions to Dismiss; 7-25-11;nb

Notice of Errata to Boyd’s Response to the US, EBID, Las Cruce’s Motions to Dismiss, and the SNM & NMSU’s Response in Support of US and EBID’s Motion; 7-22-11;nb

City of Las Cruces’ Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Boyd Response to the Motion to Dismiss Submitted by the US, EBID, Las Cruces and the Responses of the SNM & NMSU’s EBID’s Support of the Motions to Dismiss; 7-18-11;nb

Boyd Response to the Motion to Dismiss Submitted by the US, EBID, Las Cruces and the Responses of the State of New Mexico’s & NMSU’s, EBID’s Support of the Motions to Dismiss; 7-14-11;nb

NMSU’s Response in Support of Motions to Dismiss filed by the US, EBID and City of Las Cruces; 7-8-11;nb

State’s Response to Motions to Dismiss by US and City of Las Cruces; 6-15-11;nb

Brief in Support of Las Cruces’ Motion to Dismiss Boyd Claims; 5-27-11;nb

City of Las Cruces Motion to Dismiss Boyd Claims; 5-27-11;nb

Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Statement of Claim of hte Estate of Nathan Boyd (US and EBID); 5-27-11nb

Motion to Dismiss (US and EBID); 5-27-11;nb

Scheding Order for Pretrial Motions Regarding Claims of the Estate of Nathan Boyd; 4-13-11;nb

Consolidated Proposed Scheduling Report; 3-18-11;nb

Statement of Claims by Nathan E. Boyd Estate Pursuant to the Order Commencing Expedited Inter Se Proceeding to Determine the Claims of the Estate of Nathan Boyd Filed February 4, 2011- Filed 3-4-2011

ORDER Commencing Expedited Inter Se Proceeding to Determine the Claims of the Estate of Nathan Boyd ; 2-1-11;nb

ORDER Commencing Expedited Inter Se Proceeding to Determine the Claims of the Estate of Nathan Boyd ; 2-1-11nb

EBID’S Combined Supplemental Response Opposin Intervenor Boyd’s Amended Motion to Set Stream System Issue and Defendant Gonzalez’s Motion for Designation of Stream System Issue; 10-28-08;nb

State’s Response in Opposistion to Motion of the Estate of Nathan Boyd for Designation of Stream System Issue; 10-27-08;nb

Amended Motion to Set Stream System Issue; 10-6-08;nb

Limited Entry of Appearance (Jesse A. Boyd); 10-6-08;nb

Limited Entry of Appearance (JesseBoyd); 9-23-08;nb

Certificate of Service (limited Entry of Appearance by Susan Truax); 9-23-08;nb

Notice of Hearing; 9-11-08;nb

State’s Motion to Strike Motion of James Scott Boyd for Hearing on Claimed “Paramount Global Stream System Issue”; 8-9-08;nb

Correction for James Scott Boyd and the Attached Land Owners’s Motion for Hearing the Paramount Global Stream Issue in the Adjudication of the Pre-1906 Projec-Delivery and Water Rights; 8-6-08;nb

Motion for Hearing the Paramount Global Stream System Issue in the Adjudication of Pre 1906 Project-Delivery and Water Rights; 8-4-08nb

Order Granting Intervention; 4-16-02nb

Motion to Intervene; 12-17-01nb

RN-97-2413; Claims of the Estate of Nathan Boyd – Appeal-RN-97-02413

Notice of Appeal

Motion for Permission to Exceed Page Limits in Reply Brief (Boyd)

Mandate and Opinion of the Court of Appeals

Docketing Statement

Third Motion to Amend Record Proper

Amended Motion for Permission to Exceed Page Limits in Reply Brief

Notice of Non Designation of Transcript

Notice of Assignment to the General Calendar

Motion for Leave to Extend Time for Filing Reply Brief

Motion for Leave to Exceed Page or Word Limitation of Brief and to Extend Time for Filing Brief

Designation of Transcript of Proceedings on Appeal (CLC, EBID, US)

Deny-2nd Motion to Amend Record Proper

Corrected Mt Leave to Exceed Page or Word Limitation of Brief and to Extend Time for Filing Brief

SS-97-101; FDR/CIR

Forms & Files

Notice of Service List; Instructions for Pro Se Parties for Updating Service List

Notice of Service List; Instructions for Attorneys for Updating Service List

Final Judgment

Final Judgment Decision Letter

Amended Order Commencing Stream System Issue/Expedited Inter se Proceeding No. 101

SS-97-102; EBID Underground Water Claim

Forms & Files

Stipulated Subfile Order No. 102

Order Commencing Stream System Issue/Expedited Inter se Proceeding No. 102

SS-97-103; EBID Groundwater Claim

Forms & Files

Notice of Substitution- Re Mark J. Widerschein obo U.S.- Filed 5-22-2024

Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel – Martha C. Franks; 11-2-16

Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel – Francis L Reckard; 11-2-16

Notice of Returned Mail – from Mary Ann Faix-Nolan

Notice of Service List; Instructions for Pro Se Parties for Updating Service List

Defendant EBID’s Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel and Designation of Counsel(Barncastle Withdraws)

Notice of Service List; Instructions for Attorneys for Updating Service List

Amnd Order Designating Priority, Transferability and Beneficial Use Elements of Domestic Well Water

SS-97-104; US Interest

Forms & Files

1-10-14 – Verde’s Comments on Proposed Order (1) Granting Summary Judgment Regarding the Amounts of Water; (2) Denying Summary Judgment Regarding Priority Date

1-10-14 – City of Las Cruces’ Suggestions, Objections and Request for Reconsideration of the Court’s Proposed Order of December 11, 2013

1-10-14 – EPNG’S Objection to the Courts December 11, 2013, Proposed Order

1-10-14 – State of New Mexico’s Suggestions for, and Objections to, the Court’s Proposed Order of December 11, 2913

1-10-14 – United States Response to the Proposed Order

1-10-14 – Verde’s Comments on Proposed Order (1) Granting Summary Judgment Regarding the Amounts of Water; (2) Denying Summary Judgment Regarding Priority Date (1)

Notice of Status Conference; filed 11-17-2020

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Report Regarding the Continued Stay of Proceedings in SSI 104 and SSI 107; filed 3-6-2020

Joint Status Report; filed 03-05-2020

Order Extending Stay of Proceedings; filed 11-20-19

Order Regarding Joint Status Report; filed 10-4-19

Joint Status Report; filed 9-6-19

Order Extending Stay of Proceedings; filed 6-28-19

Notice of Appeal; filed 7-10-14

Amended Notice of Telephonic Hearing; filed 5-10-19

Notice of Telephonic Hearing – SS-97-104 and SS-97-107; filed 5-9-19

Notice of Hearing, Scheduling Conference and Status Conference – set for 5-21-19; filed 4-23-19

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Response to Movants’ Motion for Continued Stay of Proceedings; filed 3-22-19

Joint Status Report and Request for Continuation of Stay; filed 3-8-19

Order Extending Stay of Proceedings; filed 10-29-18

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Status Report Dated September 7, 2018; filed 9-7-18

Amended Notice of Hearing, Scheduling Conference and Status Conference; filed 10-4-18

Joint Status Report and Request for Continuation of Stay; filed 9-6-18

Notice of Hearing, Scheduling Conference and Status Conference; filed 9-5-18

Order Extending Stay of Proceedings; filed 6-26-18

Supplemental Joint Status Report; filed 4-17-18

Amended Notice of Hearing, Scheduling Conf and Status Conf; filed 4-16-18

Notice of Hearing, Scheduling Conference and Status Conference for 04-19-18 at 11 a.m.; filed 3-12-18

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Status Report and Motion for Continued Stay of Proceedings in SSI-104; filed 2-27-18

Joint status report; filed 2-28-18

Order for Continued Stay of Proceedings; filed 9-6-17

Order Protecting Confidentiality of Negotiations; filed 9-6-17

Motion for Entry of an Order Protecting Confidentiality of Negotiations; filed 8-16-17

Joint Status Report and Motion for Continued Stay of Proceedings; filed 8-16-17

Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel-Jama E. Fisk-OSE; filed 8-11-17

Notice of Hearing, Scheduling Conference and Status Conference; filed 7-28-17

Order Granting Motion to Temporarily Suspend Proceedings for Sixty Days; filed 7-7-17

Exhibits to Pre-19-6 Claimants’ Response to Movants’ Joint Status Report and Motion to Temporarily Suspend Proceedsings filed May 16, 2017; filed 6-14-17

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Response to Movants’ Joint Status Report and Motion to Temporarily Suspend Proceedsing file May 16, 2017; filed 6-14-17

Notice of Telephonic Hearing – 104-107; Filed 6-8-2017

Notice of Non-Availability – Tessa T. Davidson; filed 5-22-17

Joint Status Report and Motion to Temporarily Suspend Proceedings; 5-16-17

Entry of Appearance and Request for Notice-Douglas G. Caroom; filed 5-12-17

Order Granting SNM’s Mtn for Extension of Time to Respond to Court Question RE the Entry of a Final Subfile Order for SSS 104; 5-3-17

Motion of the SNM for Extension of Time to Respond to Court Question Regarding the Entry of a Final Subfile Order for Stream System Issue 104; filed 5-1-17

Entry of Appearance and Request for Notice-Thomas K. Snodgrass; filed 4-13-17

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; 4-17-17

Entry of Appearance and Request for Notice-Samantha R. Barncastle; filed 2-9-17

Order Denying Renewed Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings; 12-16-16

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Withdrawal of their Reply to the Renewed Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings in SS-97-104; filed 11-10-16

Reply in Support of Renewed Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings; 11-7-16

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Reply to the Renewed Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings in SS-97-104; 11-7-16

Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel – OSE – Francis L. Reckard; filed 11-9-16

Amended Notice of Hearing, Scheduling Conference and Status Conference; filed 11-9-16

Order Granting US’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Filing Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; 2-22-16

Certificate of Mailing (Order on US Mtn Extend Deadlines for Replies); 6-28-13

ORDER GRANTING US’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; 12-19-13

SS-97-104 – Service List (Updated on 5-22-15); 5-22-15

Order Granting Extension of Time to File Reply Brief in Support of Renewed Joint Motion to Stay; 10-13-16

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Response to Renewed Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings in SS-97-104 and Brief in Support; 9-30-16

City of Las Cruces’ Response in Opposition to Renewed Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings and Brief in Support; 9-30-16

Southern Rio Grande Diversified Crop Farmer’s Association’s Response in Opposition to the Renewed Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings; 9-30-16

New Mexico Pecan Grower’s Response in Opposition to the Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings; 9-30-16

Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel – EBID-Lisa J. Henne; 10-7-16

State of New Mexico’s Response to Renewed Joint Motion of the City of El Paso and Amicus EP#1 to Stay Stream System Issue 104; 9-30-16

United States’ Response in Support of Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings; 9-30-16

Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief in Support of Renewed Joint Motion to Stay; 10-7-16

SNM’s Reply to EBIDs Response to the US’ Motion to Continue the Stay of Proceedings in Stream System Issue No. 104; 10-28-11

EBID’s Response in Opposition to Pre-1906 Claimants’ Renewed Motion to Stay Proceedig in SSI-104; 10-27-15

City of Las Cruces’ Response to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Renewed Motion to Stay Proceedings in SSI-104; 10-27-15

Notice of Filing (Verde); 11-2-11

SNMs Response in Opposition to the US Motion to Continue the Stay of Proceedings in Stream System Issue No. 104; 10-13-11

Motion for Order Lifting Stay (Estate of Dr. Nathan Boyd); 11-1-10

Certificate of Service of EPNG’s Response to State’s First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production; 10-14-14

ORDER – re: stay; 10-24-11

SNM’s Response in Opposition to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Renewed Motion to Stay Proceeding in SSI-104; 10-27-15

United States’ Response in Opposition to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Renewed Motion to Stay Proceeding in SSI-104; 10-27-15

Boyds Response to US’ Motion to Stay Stream System Issue No. 104; 10-17-11

Pre-1906 Claimants Comments on the SNM’s Notice of Supplemental Authority; 10-18-13

Notice of Interim Pre-Trial Conference; 10-27-14

Certificate of Service (Jack F. and Jean M. Darbyshire Trust’s Answers to State’s First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production); 10-24-14

ORDER (request of City of Las Cruces, NMSU, NMPG and Stahmann Farms to continue stay of action of their Joint Motion to Lift Stay); 10-27-10

Certificate of Service Regarding Stahmanns Inc.’s Responses to the SNM’s First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production; 10-20-14

Verde’s Response to the US Motion to Continue the Stay of Proceedings in Stream System Issue No. 104; 10-13-11

ORDER GRANTING THE US MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE; 10-21-13

Certificate of Service (SRGDCFA Responses to the State’s First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production); 10-22-14

US Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Memorandum to Responses to Motion to Continue Stay; 10-21-11

US Motion for Continuance of Hearing; 10-18-13

Certificate of Service Regarding EBID’s Responses to the SNM’s First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production; 10-14-14

Notice of Service of US’ Objections and Response to SNM’ First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production to Defendant US; 10-14-14

Certificate of Service (NMPG, et al., Response to State’s First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production); 10-14-14

Certificate of Service (El Paso’s Answers to State’s 1st Set of Interrogatories and Request Production); 10-14-14

NMSU and the City of Las Cruces Response in Opposition to US Motion to Continue Stay; 10-13-11

Certificate of Service (Verde response to State’s First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production); 10-14-14

US Motion to Continue the Stay of Proceedings in Stream System Issue No. 104; 9-26-11

EBIDS Response to US’ Motion to Continue the Stay of Proceedings in Stream System Issue 104; 10-13-11

New Mexico State University’s Response to Certain Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Request to Set Stream Issue to Adjudicate Pre-1906 Rights; 10-5-12

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Exhibits to the Response to the 8-27-15 US’ Motion in Limine; 8-28-15

NMPGs Response to US’ Motion to Continue Stay of Proceedings in Stream System Issue No. 104; 10-13-11

EPNG’s Notice of Joinder in NMSU and City of Las Cruces’ Response Opposing the US’ Motion to Continue the Stay of Proceedings; 10-13-11

State of New Mexico’s Notice of Supplemental Authority; 10-4-13

ORDER REGARDING APPEAL #33968; 9-29-14

ORDER ON NEXT ISSUES AND SCHEDULE FOR LITIGATION REGARDING THE US’ RIO GRANDE PROJECT; 10-12-12

Notice of Withdrawal by Counsel (Victor R. Marshall); 10-10-14

The Pre-1906 Claimants’ Renewed Motion to Stay Proceedings in SSI-104; 10-9-15

SRGDCFA’S and NMPGs Joint Response to Request for Statement of Issue Regarding the US’ Rights in the Rio Grande Project and the Sammie Singh, Sr.,et al’s Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Pre-1906 Claims; 10-5-12

Entry of Appearance; 9-29-15

ORDER – MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD GRANTED; 9-28-10

City of El Pasos Joinder in US Motion to Continue Stay of Proceedings; 9-27-11

Amended Certificate of Service; 9-25-14

Additional Designation of Records for Supplement; 9-29-10

Lions’s Gate Water’s Motion to Supplement the Court Record and Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief-in-Chief; 9-28-10

Designation of Records for Supplement (Lions Gate Water); 9-28-10

Verdes Response to the US Statement of Claim for Water for the Rio Grande Project; 9-24-10

City of Las Cruces’ Comments on Other Parties’ Statements Regarding SS No. 97-104; 9-24-10

SNMs Comments on the Claims of the United States Derived from the Rio Grande Project; 9-15-10

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE IN STREAM SYSTEM ISSUE 104; 9-22-11

Notice of Hearing, Scheduling Conference and Status Conferences; 9-13-16

Submission in Response to United States Statement of Claim; 9-24-10

NMSUs Comments Regarding US Statement of Claim for Water for the Rio Grande Project; 9-24-10

United States Statement of Claim for Water for the Rio Grande Project; 9-15-10

Statement of EPCWID No. 1 Regarding the US Statement of Claim for the Rio Grande Project; 9-15-10

Notice of Hearing (set 10-24-13 @ 9:00); 9-20-13

US Response to Parties Statements on Issues in Stream System Issue No. 4; 9-17-10

Response of EPCWID No. 1 to Parties Statement of Interests in Stream System Issue No. 104; 9-15-10

SRGDCFA Response to the US Motion to Clarify and Extend Deadline in Stream System Issue No. 104; 9-16-11

Joint Response to Request for Statement of the Issues Regarding the US’ Rio Grande Project; 9-21-12

SNMs Response to Order Denying Pre-1906 Claimants Motion to Stay Further Proceeding in SS-97-104; 9-2-14

Notice of Non-Availability – Davidson, Tessa; 9-21-16

EBID Response to Renewed Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings; 9-16-16

Motion to Clarify and Extend Deadline in Stream System Issue No. 4 (US); 9-12-11

Certificate of Service (SNM’s 1st Set of Interrogatories); 9-11-14

Statement on Stream System Issues by MSPM Associates LP; 9-9-10

SRGDCF Notice of Joinder with Stahmanns, NMSU, City of Las Cruces and NMPG in the Joint Motion for Order Lifting Stay of Stream System Issue No. 104; 9-9-11

Notice of Service List and Instructions for Pro Se Parties for Updating the Service List; 9-9-10

Notice of Service List and Instructions for Attorneys for Updating the Service List; 9-9-10

Motion for Leave to Participate in Stream System 104 (MSPM); 9-9-10

AMENDED SCHEDULE ORDER FOR MOTIONS RE: SS-97-104 – US INTEREST; 9-9-10

SNM’s Response to Certain Pre-1906 Claimants Motion for Summary Judgment and Request to Set Stream System Issue to Adjudicate Pre-1906 Rights; 9-6-12

Correspondence dated 9-5-15; 9-8-15

ORDER GRANTING THE US’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; 9-6-12

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND REQUEST TO SET STREAM ISSUE TO ADJUDICATE PRE-1906 RIGHTS; 9-6-12

Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Request for Statement of the Issues Regarding the US’ Rio Grande Project; 9-5-12

ORDER ALLOWING FILING OF LATE NOTICE OF INTENT TO PARTCIPATE; 9-2-10

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE NOTICE OF INTENT TO PARTICIPATE IN STREAM SYSTEM ISSUE NO. 104 (Triple A Farms); 9-1-10

Verde’s Statement of Interest and Legal Position; 8-30-10

Statement on Stream System Issues by MSPM Associates LP; 8-30-10

Statement of Claims of Interest in Stream System Issue No. 104 (Triple A Farms, LLC, et.al.); 8-30-10

NMSU’s Claim of Interest and Legal Position Regarding Stream System Issue No. 104; 8-30-10

SNM’s Separate Report Stating Issues that can Next be Addressed in Stream System Issue SS-97-104; 9-5-12

Stahmanns Inc’s Claims of Interest; 8-30-10

Motion for Leave to File Notice of Intent to Participate in Stream System Issue No. 104; 8-30-10

Claims of Interest and Position Regarding Stream System Issue SS-97-104 (Boyd, et.al); 8-30-10

City of Las Cruces’ Statement of Interest in Stream System Issue No. 104; 8-30-10

City of El Paso’s Claim of Interest and Legal Position; 8-30-10

Renewed Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings and Brief in Support; 8-29-16

Notice of Change of Law Firm and Address; 8-29-16

Certificate of Service; 8-29-16

SNM’s Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply to EBIDs Reply in Opposition to the States Reponse to US MSJ and SurReply; 8-20-13

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Response to the US’ Motion in Limine; 8-28-15

US’ Motion in Limine to Exclude Trial Evidence and Arguments that are Irrelevant and More Properly Relate to Issues Set for Hearing in Separate Proceedings; 8-27-15

Subfile Offer of Judgment to Settle the United States of Americas Rio Grande Project Rights; 8-29-11

Final Pretrial Order; 8-28-15

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Reply in Support of Their Motion Requesting Designation of an Expedited inter se Proceeding; 8-10-15

SNM and CLC’ Response in Partial Support of the US’ Motion in Limine; 8-27-15

Memorandum Opinion and Order Addressing Pretrial Motions in SS-97-104; 8-20-15

Notice of Filing Docketing Statement (Pre-1906 Claimants by Robert Simon) Docketing Statement attached-118 pgs total (RE Order of June 18 2014); 8-11-14

Letter from Honorable James J. Wechsler dated August 27, 2015 = regarding Opening Statements; 8-27-15

NMPG’s Supplemental Final Trial and Demonstrative Exhibits List; 8-25-15

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO FILE ADDITIONAL PLEADINGS; 8-22-13

Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Pre 1906 Claimants’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 8-22-12

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment; 8-22-12

Request for Statement of Issues Regarding the United States’ Rio Grande Project; 8-16-12

Order Granting the State of New Mexico and City of Las Cruces’ June 29, 2015 Motion to Exclude Evidence; 8-18-15

Motion for Summary Judgment and Request to Set Stream Issue to Adjudicate Pre-1906 Rights; 8-22-12

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE; 8-20-12

SNM’s Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply to the City El Paso’s Reply to the SNMs Response in Opp to US MSJ; 8-20-13

SNM’s Reply to NMPGs and SRGDCF’s Responses to its MSJ on the Amounts of Water and Priority Dates for the US’ Rio Grande Project Right; 8-5-13

Stipulation Regarding Authenticity and Admissibility of Exhibit Documents; 8-16-13

Letter dated 08-17-15 from Honorable James J. Wechsler regarding three summary judgment motions filed on June 29, 2015; 8-18-15

Order Granting the State’s Motion to Dismiss the US’ Claims to Groundwater and Denying the US’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 8-16-12

US Consolidated Reply to Responses filed to Motions in Support of Summary Judgment; 8-5-13

Notice of Filing Motion to Limit Record Proper in Appeal of June18, 2014 Order; 8-12-14

Pre-1906 Representative Claimants’ Proposed Scheduling Order; 8-10-15

Notice of Filing Motion to Limit Record Proper in Appeal No. 33,672 in the New Mexico Court of Appeals; 8-12-14

Order Taking Under Advisement Request to Lift Stay on Amicus Status for Lion’s Gate Water; 8-11-10

State of New Mexico’s Proposed Scheduling Order for Expedited inter se Proceedings; 8-7-15

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Proposed Pre-trial Statements; 8-3-15

US’ Supplement to its Motion and Memorandum for Summary Judgment; Affidavit of Andrew Gahan; 8-5-13

SNM’s Reply to EBID’s Response to All Pending Motions for Summary Judgment; 8-5-13

SNM’s Reply to City of El Paso’s Combined Response to the MSJ on Project Priority and Amnt; 8-5-13

SNM’s Reply to US Consolidated Response in Opposition to the SNM’s and the CLC’ Motions and Memoranda in Support of Summary Judgment; 8-5-13

Pre-1906 Claimants Consolidated Reply to the US, OSE, CLC, EBID, NMSU, EPCWD1 and Verde Group’s Response to the US, Las Cruces, OSE and the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motions for Summary Judgmetn Regarding the US’ Claims in SSI-104 in the LRGA; 8-5-13

City of Las Cruces Reply to the US Consolidated Response in Opposition to the SNM and CLC Motions and Memoranda in Support of Summary Judgment; 8-5-13

Reply of SNM and the CLC to the Pre-1906 Claimants Response to the Mtns for SJ of US, State, LC; 8-5-13

EBIDs Mtn for Leave to Reply and Reply State of New Mexicos Response Regarding Motions for Summary Judgment; 8-5-13

City of Las Cruces Reply to City of El Pasos Combined Response to Motions for Summary Judgment on Project Priority and Amount; 8-5-13

City of El Paso’s Motion for Leave to Reply and Reply to SNM’s Response in Opposition to US MSJ; 8-5-13

Proposed Pretrial Statements of SNM and CLC; 8-3-15

US’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support; 6-29-15

SCHEDULING ORDER FOR MOTIONS SS-97-104 UNITED STATES INTERESTS; 8-4-10

Addendum to Response in Opposition of the SNM and CLC to the US’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; 7-27-15

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Notice of Filing Motion to Amend Record Proper in COA #33,672; 7-31-14

Motion to Amend Record Proper (COA #33,672); 7-31-14

Order Denying the State of New Mexico’s Motion to Preclude Reply from the City of El Paso; 7-31-12

Order Denying the State of New Mexico’s Motion to Preclude Additional Brief from EP#1; 7-31-12

United States’ Reply to the State of New Mexico and the City of Las Cruces’ Response in Opposition to the United States’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; 7-30-15

Schedule of Hearings Regarding Pretrial Motions; 7-29-15

SRGDCFA’ Response to the SNM and CLC’ Joint Motion to Exclude Evidence Unrelated to the US’ Interests in the Rio Grande Project; 7-23-15

Notice of Hearing Regarding Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Designate Expedited Inter Se Proceedings; 7-29-15

City of Las Cruces 2nd half of Exhibits to the MSJ; 6-29-15

State of New Mexico’s Response in Opposition to Motion to Designate Expedited Inter Se; 7-16-15

EBID’s Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel and Designation of Counsel; 7-25-14

Notice of Pre-Trial Conference (Amended); 7-24-14

EBID’s Response to SNM and CLC’ Joint Motion to Exclude Evidence Unrelated to the US’ Interests in the Rio Grande Project; 7-21-15

Response in Opposition of the SNM and the CLC of the US’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; 7-21-15

NMPG’s Response in Opposition to the City of Las Cruces’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that the US’ is Estopped from Obtaining a Pre-1906 Priority Date for the Rio Grande Project and Brief in Support; 7-21-15

NMPG’s Response to SNM and CLC’ Joint Motion to Exclude Evidence Unrelated to the US’ Interests in the Rio Grande Project; 7-21-15

United States’ Consolidated Reply to Responses to the US Motion for Summary Judgment; 7-13-12

EBID’s Response to Renewed Motion of the SNM and CLC for Summary Judgment on the Priority Dates of the US’ Rio Grande Project; 7-21-15

SRGDCFA’s Joinder in US’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support; 7-17-15

Notice of Interim Pre-trial Conference and Motion Hearing; 7-17-15

EBID’s Joinder in US’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support; 7-17-15

NMPG’s Joinder in US’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support; 7-16-15

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response and Reply Briefs to all Pre-trial Motions in Stream System Issue No. 104; 7-14-15

EBID’s Objection to Pre-1906 Claimants’, SNM, and City of Las Cruces’ Exhibit Lists; 7-10-15

United States’ Objections to the SNM, CLC, and Pre-1906 Claimants’ Exhibit Lists and Expert Reports; 7-10-15

State of New Mexico’s Reply to EBID’s Response to Dispositive Motions Regarding the Source of Water for the Rio Grande Project; 7-13-12

NMSU’ Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss the US’ Ownership Claims to Groundwater; 7-13-12

State of New Mexico’s Motion to Strike Response of Certain Pre-1906 Claimants to US Motion for Summary Judgment; 7-13-12

NMPG’s Reply to the US’ and EBID’s Responses to NMPG’s Motion to Dismiss the US’ Claim to Groundwater Rights in the Lower Rio Grande; 7-13-12

Verde’s Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss the US’ Claims to Groundwater as a Source of Water for the Rio Grande Project Right; 7-12-12

Motion to Preclude Additional Brief from EP#1 on the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment (filed by SNM); 7-10-12

City of Las Cruces’ Consolidated Reply to Responses to the City of Las Cruces’ Motion to Dismiss and Limit Claims of the United States; 7-13-12

City of El Paso’s Response in Opposition to State’s Motion to Preclude Reply Brief from City of El Paso on United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 7-13-12

City of El Paso’s Reply in Support of United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 7-13-12

City of Las Cruces’ Notice of Joinder in SNM’s Motion to Preclude Additional Brief from EP#1 on the US’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 7-11-12

Objections of the SNM and the CLC to the Proposed Exhibit and Witness Lists of the Participating Parties in SSI 104, US Priority Date; 7-10-15

City of Las Cruces’ Notice of Joinder in SNM’s Motion to Preclude Reply Brief from City of EL Paso on the US’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 7-11-12

City of El Paso’s Joinder in US’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support; 7-7-15

Motion to Preclude Reply Brief from City of El Paso on the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment (filed by SNM); 7-10-12

SRGDCFA Amended Expert Witness List; 7-7-14

Notice of Unavailability of Counsel (EBID-Lisa J. Henne); 7-9-15

Clarified Objections of the SNM and the CLC to the Proposed Exhibit and Witness Lists of the Participating Parties in SSI 104, United States Priority Date; 7-10-15

Notice of Unavailability of Counsel – Dempsey, Rebecca; 7-8-16

Statement of Rights of Pre-1906 Representative Claimants Pursuant to the Court’s June 1, 2015 Order; 6-30-15

El Paso Natural Gas Company’s Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss United States’ Claims to Groundwater; 7-10-12

Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response and Reply Briefs to All Pre-Trial Motions in Stream System Issue No. 104; 7-9-15

SNM and CLC Memorandum in Support of Joint Motion to Exclude Evidence Unrelated to the US’ Interests in the Rio Grande Project; 6-29-15

Certificate of Service RE: Record Proper Appeal 33672; 7-9-14

Certificate of Costs from the County of Dona Ana in the State of New Mexico RE: Appeal 33672; 7-9-14

NMPG’s Final Trial and Demonstrative Exhibits List; 6-26-15

Amended Notice of Unavailability – Rebecca Dempsey; 7-8-16

Verdes Response to the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 6-21-12

The Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion Requesting Designationof Expedited Inter Se Proceeding to Address Representative Claimants’ Sub-Files; 6-30-15

Exhibits to the SNM and CLC Memo in support of Renewed Mtn for SJ; 6-29-15

SRGDCFA’s Final Trial and Demonstrative Exhibits List; 6-29-15

SNM and City of Las Cruces’ Joint Motion to Exclude Evidence Unrelated to the US’ Interests in the Rio Grande Project; 6-29-15

Renewed Motion of the SNM and the CLC for Summary Judgment on the Priority Dates of the USâ?? Rio Grande Project Right; 6-29-15

State of New Mexico and City of Las Cruces Trial Exhibit List; 6-26-15

United States’ Consolidated Response to Motions to Dismiss; 6-21-12

United States’ List of Trial Exhibits; 6-26-15

EBID’s Final Trial Exhibit and Demonstrative Exhibit List; 6-26-15

City of El Paso’s Final Trial Exhibit List; 6-26-15

NMPG’s Response to the US’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support; 6-21-12

Defendants’ Pre-1906 Claimants’ Trial Exhibit List; 6-24-15

Order on US’ Motion for Extension of the Deadline for Filing Pre-Trial Motions; 6-22-15

EBID’s Notice of Errata (correct its June 21, 2012 filing); 6-26-12

Scheduling Report (by SNM); 6-24-11

EPNG’s Response to US’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 6-22-12

SRGDCFA’s Response to Sammie Singh, Sr., et. al’s Motion to Dismiss all Claims by the U.S.; 6-21-12

Stahmanns Inc.’s Notice of Joinder in New Mexico Pecan Growers’ Response to the US’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support; 6-22-12

Affidavit of Mark F. Sheridan in Support of EPNG’s Request for Rule 1-056(F) Relief; 6-22-12

EBID’s Response to all Dispositive Motions Regarding the Source or Sources of Water for the Rio Grande Project; 6-21-12

City of Las Cruces’ Response in Opposition to the US’ Motion for Summary Judgment

SRGCFA’ Response to US’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 6-21-12

SNM’s Memorandum in Opposition to US’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 6-21-12

US’ Motion for Extension of the Deadline for Filing Pre-Trial Motions; 6-18-15

NMSUs Response to the United States Motion for Summary Judgment; 6-21-12

SNM’s Response in Opposition to the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 5-24-13

NMPG Response to Sammie Singh Sr., et al’s Motion to Dismiss all Claims by the US; 6-21-12

El Paso County Water Improvement District No 1’s Brief in Support of the US’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 6-21-12

City of El Paso’s Response to Motions to Dismiss; 6-21-12

Certificate of Service – SNM Responds to 3rd Set of Discovery; 6-3-15

Order on EBID’s Motion for Extension of the Deadlines for Filing Final Trial Exhibit List and Demonstrative Exhibits; 6-19-15

Order Denying Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings in Stream System Issue 104; 6-19-1497104

ORDER ON US’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLIES TO RESPONSES TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS IN SS 104; 6-20-13

NOTICE OF HEARING; 6-9-16

Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Replies to Responses to Summary Judgment Motions in SS104; 6-19-13

Order Denying Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Stay Further Proceedings in SS-97-104; 6-18-14

EBID’s Motion for Extension of the Deadlines for Filing Final Trial Exhibit Lists and Demonstrative Exhibits; 6-17-15

SRGDCFA’s Expert Witness List; 6-16-14

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Expert Witness List; 6-16-14

United States’ Disclosure and Identification of Expert Witness; 6-13-14

City of Las Cruces’ Expert Witness List; 6-13-14

Response of US, EBID, and El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1 to Motion for Order Lifting Stay of Stream System Issue NO. 104; 6-9-10

United States’ Notice of Errata; 5-29-12

Verde’s Response to United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Response to State of New Mexico’s Motion for Summary Judgment; 5-24-13

SNM’s Expert Witness List; 6-13-14

NMSU’s Expert Witness List; 6-13-14

EBID’s Disclosure and Identification of Expert Witness; 6-13-14

NMPGs’ Response to the City of Las Cruces Motion for Summary Judgment on Priority and Amnt Water for United States’ Ro Grande Project; 5-24-13

Order Denying Pre-1906 Claimants’ Feburary 18, 2015 Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel; 6-1-15

Order Denying Pre-1906 Claimants’ February 28, 2015 Motion for Threshold Issue, and Establishing an Expedited Inter Se Proceeding on Representative Claims; 6-1-15

State of New Mexico’s Reply to United States’ Response to Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings; 5-27-14

EPCWID #1’s Response to the United States Motion for Summary Judgment; 5-24-13

Consolidated Reply in Support of Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings (EP/EPCWID); 5-27-14

Corrected Notice of Renewed Deposition Duces Tecum to Andrew H. Gahan; 5-28-15

State of New Mexico’s Reply to EBID’s Response to Motion to Stay Proceedings; 5-27-14

US’ Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment; 5-18-12

US’ Consolidated Response in Opposition to the State of New Mexico’s and the CIty of Las Cruces’ Motions and Memoranda in Support of Summary Judgment; 5-24-13

NMPGs’ Response to the SNM’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Amounts of Water and Priority Dates for the US’ Rio Grande Project Right; 5-24-13

SNM’s Response in Opposition to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Summary Judgment Against the U.S. Claims Under SSI 104; 5-24-13

NMSU’s Response to the United States Motion for Summary Judgment; 5-24-13

NMPGs’ Response to the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support; 5-24-13

EPNG’s Response in Opposition to the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 5-24-13

NMPGs’ Response to Pre-1906 Claimants Motion for Summary Judgment Against the US Claims Under SSI 104; 5-24-13

EPCWID #1’s Response to the Pleading of Pre-1906 Claimants’ Miscaptioned as Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Summary Judgment Against the U.S. Claims Under SSI 104; 5-24-13

Pre-1906 Claiamnts’ Reply in Support of their Motion for Threshold Issue; 5-18-15

EPCWID #1’s Response to State of New Mexico’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Amounts of Water and Priority Dates for the US’ Rio Grande Project Right; 5-24-13

City of EL Paso’s Combined Response to the Motions for Summary Judgment on Project Priority and Amount; 5-24-13

SRGDCFA Motion to Dismiss US’ Claim to Rio Grande Project Water Rights; 5-18-12

EPCWID #1’s Response to City of Las Cruces Motion for Summary Judgment on Priority Date & Amounts; 5-24-13

Notice of Unavailability of Counsel (Rebecca Dempsey); 5-23-14

SRGDCFA’s Response to Summary Judgment Motions of the Pre-1906 Claimants, United States, State of New Mexico and the City of Las Cruces; 5-23-13

Correspondence – Carolyn Adams; 5-22-15

Notice of Renewed Deposition Duces Tecum to Andrew H. Gahan; 5-21-15

Notice of Non-Availability (Reckard); 5-20-13

United States’ Response to Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings; 5-15-14

Notice to the SNM for Deposition Duces Tecum of NMRA Rule 1-030(b)6) Designated Person; 5-19-15

Notice of Unavailability of Counsel-R. Lee Leininger; 5-19-16

Joint Motion to Set Oral Argument; 5-18-16

Verde’s Motion to Dismiss the US’ Claims to Groundwater as a Source of Water for the Rio Grande Project Right; 5-18-12

SNM’s Reply to the Responses of the US, EPCWID#1, and City of El Paso to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel; 5-18-15

Sammie Singh, Sr., Sammie Singh, Jr., Ed Provencio, Jonny Diaz, and John Fleming as Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Dismiss all Claims by the US; 5-18-12

United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 5-18-12

SNMs Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss the US Claims to Groundwater as a Source of Water for the Rio Grande Project; 5-18-12

SNM’s Motion to Dismiss the US’ Claims to Groundwater as a Source of Water for the Rio Grande Project Right; 5-18-12

Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of US’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 5-18-12

Verde Realty Operating Partnership, L.P., Verde Railroad Land LLC, Verde Intermodal Industrial Park, LLC, and Verde Border Industrial Park, LLC’s Response to the City of El Paso’s Motion to Stay Proceedings; 5-15-14

US, EBID, NMPG, SRGDCGA’ Joint Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; 5-9-16

NMSUs Motion to Dismiss the United States Claim to Ownership of Groundwater; 5-18-12

NMSU’s Memorandum Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss the US’ Ownership Claims to Groundwater; 5-18-12

NMPG’s Motion to Dismiss the US’ Claim to Groundwater Rights in the Lower Rio Grande and its Brief in Support; 5-18-12

EPNG’s Motion to Dismiss States’ Claims to Groundwater as a Source of Water; 5-18-12

City of Las Cruces’ Motion to Dismiss and Limit Claims of the US; 5-18-12

City of Las Cruces’ Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss and Limit Claims of the US; 5-18-12

City of Las Cruces’ Response in Opposition to Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings and Brief in Support; 5-15-14

Notice of Deposition Duces Tecum; 5-15-15

Defendant EBID’s Response to Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings and Brief in Support; 5-15-14

Stahmann’s, NMSU’s, City of Las Cruces’ and NMPG’s Joint Motion for Order Lifting Stay of Stream System Issue No. 104; 5-18-10

State of New Mexico’s Response in Opposition to Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings; 5-15-14

US, EBID, NMPG and SRGDCGA’s Post-Trial Brief; 5-9-16

ORDER AMENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS REGARDING THE SOURCE OR SOURCES OF WATER FOR THE RIO GRANDE PROJECT; 5-17-12

New Mexico Pecan Growers Response in Opposition to the Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings; 5-16-14

NMSU’s Response in Opposition to Joint Motion to Stay; 5-15-14

United States’ Response in Opposition to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel; 5-8-15

Notice of Deposition Duces Tecum; 5-14-15

Certificate of Service; 5-11-16

SRGDCFA’ Response in Opposition to the Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings; 5-14-14

United States Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment; 4-24-13

Certificate of Service – Brief; 5-11-16

US’ Notice of Withdrawal of Motion; 5-11-15

City of Las Cruces’ Response in Opposition to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel; 5-11-15

Joint Motion of the US and SNM for Amended Schedule in Stream System Issue No. 104 and Request for Expedited Consideratione; 5-10-12

State of New Mexico’s Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; 5-9-16

City of Las Cruces’ Requested Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; 5-9-16

City of Las Cruces’ Post-Trial Brief in Support of 1906, 1908, and 1939 Priority Dates for the Rio Grande Project and Request for Oral Argument; 5-9-16

Response of Amicus Curiae EPCWID#1 in Opposition to Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel; 5-1-15

City of El Paso and EPCWID1’s Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Relating to a Priority Date for the Rio Grande Project Right of the US; 5-9-16

US Motion for One Week Extension of Filing Deadlines in Stream System Issue No. 104 Briefing and Request for Expedited Consideration; 5-9-12

ORDER GRANTING EBID’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; 5-9-13

Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings and Brief in Support (City of El Paso, with the support of EPCWID); 4-17-14

EPCWID #1’s Response to EBID’s Motion for Extension of Time; 5-8-13

EBIDs Motion for Extension of Time to File Responses to Summary Judgment Motions & Replies; 5-3-13

Order on US’ Motion for One Week Extension of Filing Responses on Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel in Stream System Issue No. 104; 5-4-15

SNM’s Response in Opposition to Defendant EBIDs Motion for Extension of Time to File Summary Judgment Motions & Replies; 5-7-13

City of Las Cruces Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment on Priority Date and Amounts of Water for United States’ Rio Grande Project Right; 4-19-13

US’ Motion for Continuance of Interim Pre-Trial Conference and Motion Hearing; 5-1-15

US’ Motion for Extension of the Deadlines for Filing Responses and Replies to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel; 5-1-15

SNM’s Response to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel; 5-1-15

SNM’s Response in Opposition to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Threshold Issue; 5-1-15

Response of Amicus Curiae EPCWID#1 in Opposition to Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Threshold Issue; 5-1-15

Notice of Interim Pre-Trial Conference and Motion Hearing; 4-28-15

City of Las Cruces Motion for Summary Judgment on Priority Date and Amounts of water for the United States’ Rio Grande Project Right; 4-29-13

EBID’ and the US’ Joint Response to Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Threshold Issue; 5-1-15

Notice of Service of US’ Third Set of Interrogatories, Requests for Prodeuction and Request for Admission to the SNM; 5-1-15

Certificate of Service (SNM Responses to Pre-1906 Claimants Mtn Threshold/MtnJudicial Estoppel); 5-1-15

Notice of Service of US’ 3rd Set of Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Requests for Admission to the State of New Mexico; 5-1-15

Notice of Motion Hearing Re: Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Stay; 4-29-14

Notice of Motion Hearing re: EP and EPCWID Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings; 4-29-14

Order on US’ Motion for Extension of the Deadline to File Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Post-Trial Briefs; 4-28-16

Notice of Interim Pre-Trial Conference set for May 29 2014 at 8:30 a.m.; 4-29-14

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; 4-26-16

Motion for Extension of Time to Answer the City of El Paso’s and the El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1’s Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings; 4-29-14

State of New Mexico Rebuttal Witness List; 4-22-15

Certificate of Service (SNM’s 2nd Set of Discovery to Pre-1906 Claimants); 4-28-15

Notice of Interim Pre-Trial Conference; 4-27-15

Memorandum in Support of SNMs Motion for Summary Judgment on the Amounts of Water and Priority Dates for the United States’ Rio Grande Project; 4-19-13

Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Proposed Finding of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Post-Trial Briefs; 4-27-16

United States Motion for Determination that the US Filing of Summary Judgment Pleading is Timely, or in the Alternative, Allowing the Late Filings of Pleadings; 4-24-13

United States Motion for Summary Judgment; 4-24-13

Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of United States Motion for Summary Judgment; 4-24-13

United States’ Disclosure of Rebuttal Witness List; 4-22-15

Southern Rio Grande Diversified Crop Farmers Association’s Trial Witness List; 4-22-15

New Mexico Pecan Growers’ Trial Witness List; 4-22-15

City of Las Cruces’ Rebuttal Witness List; 4-22-15

Elephant Butte Irrigation District’s Witness List; 4-22-15

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Designation of Fact Witnesses; 4-21-15

Mandate and Opinion; 4-13-15

ORDER Regarding Motion of EPCWID No. 1 to Make Filing in Stream System Issue 104; 4-13-12

SNMs Motion for Summary Judgment on the Amounts of Water and Priority Dates for the United States’ Rio Grande Project Right; 4-19-13

Pre-1906 DocketingStatement; 4-7-14

Notice of Non-Availability-Reckard; 4-17-14

ORDER – Setting Briefing Schedule for Dispositive Motions Regarding the Source or Sources of Water for the US Rio Grande Project; 4-13-12

Boyd Estate, et al as Pre-1906 Claimants’ Comment to the State Engineer and the US’ Proposal for the Threshold Issues for Project Water Rights; 3-30-12

Motion for Extension of Time to File Summary Judgment Motions in Stream System Issue No. 104; 4-10-13

Pre-1906 Claimants’ and Boyd Interests Reply in Support of Their Motion to Stay Proceedings in SSI 104; 3-27-14

US and EBID’s Joint Response to Pre-1906 Claimants Motion to Stay Further Proceedings in SSI-97-104; 3-17-14

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Withdrawal of Designation of Expert Witness; 4-10-15

Verde’s Comments on the US’ and SNM’s Separate Reports Regarding SSI 97-104; 3-30-12

ORDER GRANTING THE US MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS; 4-10-13

NMSU Comment RE State and US Proposals filed March 16, 2012; 3-30-12

City of El Pasos and Amicus Comments re: Statements of Issue; 3-30-12

SRGDCFAs Comments Regarding the US and SNMs Statements of Issues Pertaining to the US’ Claims to Groundwater (objections Nos. 5&8); 3-30-12

NMPG’s Comments RE the US’ and the SNM’s Statements of Issues Pertaining to the US’ Claims to Groundwater (objections 5 & 8); 3-30-12

El Paso Natural Gas Companys Comment Re New Mexico’s and US’ Statements of Issues Filed March 16, 2012; 3-30-12

EBID’S Comments Re the US’ Proposal for Threshold Issue; 3-30-12

City of Las Cruces’ Comments in Support of State Engineer’s REport to the Court and Proposed Scheduling Order; 3-30-12

Notice of Comment Period; 3-20-12

Request for Setting (Motion to Stay Further Proceedings); 3-28-14

Notice of Completion of Briefing (Motion to Stay); 3-28-14

SNMs Response in Opposition to the Pre-1906 Claimants Motion to Stay Further Proceedings in SSI-97-104; 3-17-14

Order Granting Joint Motion for Extension of time to submit Trial Witness Lists, Expert Rebuttal Reports and to Disclose Rebuttal Witness Lists; 3-6-15

Notice of Non-Availability – Tessa T. Davidson; 3-25-15

Notice of Non-Availability – Robert Simon; 3-17-16

US’ Proposal for Threshold Issue, RE: State’s Subfile Offer of Judgment to Settle the USA’s Rio Grande Project Rights; 3-16-12

SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING PRIORITY DATE PROCEEDINGS; 3-13-14

Notice of Unavailability of Counsel (Dempsey); 3-3-15

SNMs Separate Report on the Status of the Statement of Issues Pertaining to the US Claims’ to Groundwater (Objection Nos. 5&8); 3-16-12

Notice of Appeal (Pre-1906 Claimants); 3-12-14

Notice of Unavailability of Counsel-Dempsey; 3-11-16

Tentative Outline for SS-97-104 Priority Date Schedule (submitted by OSE on 2-28-14); 3-3-14

Notice of Non-Availability (Simon); 3-9-15

Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Submit Trial Witness Lists, Expert Rebuttal Reports and to Disclose Rebuttal Witness Lists; 3-4-15

Amended Notice of Deposition Duces Tecum to Andrew H. Gahan; 2-27-15

Letter RE: Tentative Priority Date Schedule; (submitted by OSE on Court 2-28-14); 3-3-14

Notice of Hearing (Amended) – Set for March 7, 2014 @ 10:30 a.m.; 2-26-14

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Threshold Issue (26 pgs); 2-18-15

Pre-1906 Claimants Motion to Stay Further Proceedings in SSI-97-104; 2-28-14

Joint Reply of SNM and City of Las Cruces to City of El Paso’s Disputed Issues of Fact and Law re: US’ Response to State’s Offer of Judgment; 2-16-12

ORDER (1) GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING THE AMOUNTS OF WATER; (2) DENYING SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING PRIORITY DATE; (3) DENYING SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO THE PRE-1906 CLAIMANTS; and (4) SETTING A SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; 2-17-14

Certificate of Service; 2-20-15

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel; 2-18-15

Notice of Deposition Duces Tecum to Andrew H. Gahan; 2-20-15

US’ Consolidated Reply to Responses, RE: Offer of Judgment to Settle the US’ Rio Grande Project Water Rights; 2-16-12

Boyd Estate, et al., as Pre-1906 Claimants Reply to the State Engineer, et al., Responses to US Claim for Project Rights; 2-16-12

EBIDs Notice of Unavailability; 2-4-14

EBID-Notice of Unavailability; 2-18-13

2-16-12 – SNM, City of Las Cruces and Verde’s General Reply to the US’ Response to the State’s Offer of Judgment and the Responses of Participating Parties

SNM’s Reply to Verde’s Response and City of Las Cruces’ Reply to the US’ Response to the State’s Offer of Judgment to Settle the USA’s Rio Grande Project Rights; 2-16-12

NMSU’ Reply to Responses of United States and Other Participating Parties; 2-16-12

EBIDs Reply to All Responses Filed 1-20-12 regarding Statements of Issues to be Litigated in above Captioned Stream System Issue; 2-16-12

Notice of Deposition Decus Tecum to Neal W. Ackerly, PhD.; 2-3-15

EPCWIDs Reply in Support of Motion to Make Filings in Stream System Issue 104; 2-10-12

Status Hearing-Set for March 7, 2014 @ 9:00 am; 2-6-14

ORDER ON US MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLY TO RESPONSES REGARDING STATE’S OFFER OF JUDGMENT TO SETTLE THE US’ RIO GRANDE PROJECT WATER RIGHTS; 2-6-12

NMPGs Reply to Parties Responses to the US Response to States Offer of Judgment to Settle the US’ Rights in the Rio Grande Project; 2-16-12

EPNG Notice of Joinder in NMSU’s Reply to Responses of US and Other Participating Parties; 2-16-12

US Motion for Extension of Time to Reply to Responses Regarding States Offer of Judgment to Settle the US’ Rio Grande Project Water Rights; 1-31-12

SRGDCFAs Response to El Paso County Water Improvement Districts Motion to Make Filings in Stream System Issue No. 104; 1-30-12

Notice of Non-Availability-Simon; 1-30-14

Notice of Interim Pre-Trial Conference; 1-29-15

Certificate of Service; 1-29-15

Statement Concerning Prioritization of Stream System Issues; 1-29-10

Joint Response of the SNM and the City of Las Cruces in Opposition to EPCWIDs Motion to Make Filing; 1-27-12

NMPG’s and Individual Pecan Growers’ Response to US’ Response to State’s Offer of Judgment to Settle the US’ Rio Grande Project Water Rights; 1-23-12

Verde’s Response to US’ Response to State’s Offer of Judgment to Settle the United States’ Rio Grande Project Water Rights; 1-20-12

The Boyd Estate, et. al., as Pre-1906 Claimants’ Response to the US’ Response to the State Engineer’s Offer of Judgment to the US for Project Rights; 1-20-12

State of New Mexico’s Comments on the Listed Disputed Material Facts and Issues of Law Enumerated in the United States’ Response to the State’s Offer of Judgment; 1-20-12

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Second Amended Expert Witness List; 1-29-15

Pre-1906 Claimants’ First Amended Expert Witness List; 1-28-15

Certificate of Service of State’s Second Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production to Defendant United States; 1-28-15

Entry of Appearance – Lisa J. Henne OBO EBID; 1-27-15

Response of El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1 to US’ Response to State’s Offer of Judgment to Settle the US’ Rio Grande Project Water Rights; 1-20-12

EBID’s Response to US’ Response to State’s Offer of Judgment to Settle the US’ Rio Grande Project Water Rights; 1-20-12

Boyd – Additional Exhibits to the US Response to States Offer of Judgment; 1-20-12

NMPG’s and Indiviidual Pecan Growers’ Response to United States’ Response to State’s Offer of Judgment to Settle US’ Rio GRande Project Water Rights; 1-20-12

EBIDs Response to EPCWID Motion to Make Filings in Stream System Issue 104; 1-20-12

City of Las Cruces’ Reply to the US’ Response to State of New Mexico’s Offer of Judgment on United States’ Water Rights; 1-20-12

Boyd – Exhibits to the US Response to States Offer of Judgment to the US for Project Rights; 1-20-12

El Paso County Water Improvement Districts Motion to Make Filings in Stream System Issue 104; 1-17-12

Receipt for Exhibits; 1-19-16

City of El Paso’s Disputed Issues of Fact and Law RE: US’ Response to State’s Offer of Judgment; 1-20-12

SRGDCFA’s Reply to the US’ Response to State’s Offer of Judgment to Settle the US’ Rio Grande Project Water Rights; 1-19-12

Certificate of Service-EBID’s Expert Report prepared by Dr. Neal Ackerly; 1-12-15

Certificate of Service-City of Las Cruces’ Statement of Opinions of Eluid L. Martinez; 1-12-15

Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time Until January 12, 2015 to File Expert Reports; 1-9-15

State of New Mexico’s Response in Opposition to Amended Motion to Extend Time for Filing Pre-1906 Claimants’ Expert’s Report; 1-8-15

Order Setting a Deadline for the Filing of Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; 1-5-16

City of Las Cruces Amended Response to Motion for Order Lifting Stay; 12-16-10

Notice of Judge Reassignment (Partial); 12-13-10

US Response to States Offer of Judgment to Settle the US Rio Grande Project Water Rights; 1-5-12

Motion to Extend Time for Filing Pre-1906 Claimants’ Expert’s Report; 1-8-15

Amended Motion to Extend Time for Filing Pre-1906 Claimants’ Expert’s Report; 1-8-15

SNMs Response to Various Movants Motion for Order Lifting Stay; 12-15-10

Reply to Responses to Motion for Order Lifting Stay (Boyd); 12-21-10

Order Designating Stream System Issue/Expedited Inter Se Proceeding No. 104, The United States Interests in the Stream System; 1-8-10

United States’ Motion for Extension of Time; 12-17-13

Notice of Non-Availability (Simon 11-22 through 12-4); 11-5-14

Response of US, EBID, EPCWID #1 to Motion for Order Lifting Stay; 12-15-10

City of Las Cruces Response to Motion for Order Lifting Stay; 12-15-10

US’ Reply to Responses to Motion to Continue the Stay of Proceedings in Stream System Issue No. 104; 11-8-11

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Sammie Singh, Sr., et.al., Supplemental Exhibits to their Reply in Support Motion for Summary Judgment; 12-7-12

SNMs Reply to Boyds Response to the US Motion to Stay Stream System Issue No. 104; 11-8-11

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO CONTINUE STAY and SETTING INITIAL SCHEDULE OF PROCEEDINGS IN SSI No. 104; 11-29-11

Statement of Rights and Interests of Pre-1906 Water and Project Rights in SS-104 filed on behalf of the Estate of Dr. Nathan Boyd, et.al; 12-1-10

Notice of Supreme Court’s Order Appointing Special Master in No. 141, Orig., Texas v New Mexico et al; 11-6-14

Certificate of Service (Pre1906 Claimants’ Responses to SNM’s First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production); 11-3-14

Post-Trial (Motions, Orders, etc.)

EBID’s Response in Opposition to Pre-1906 Claimants’ Renewed Motion to Stay Proceedig in SSI-104

Receipt for Exhibits

United States’ Response in Opposition to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Renewed Motion to Stay Proceeding in SSI-104

The Pre-1906 Claimants’ Renewed Motion to Stay Proceeding in SSI-104

SNM’s Response in Opposition to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Renewed Motion to Stay Proceeding in SSI-104

Order Denying Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Stay Expedited Inter Se Proceeding Pending a Tenth Circuit Decision in James Scott Boyd, et al V. United States, et al, Case No. 15-002

City of Las Cruces’ Response to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Renewed Motion to Stay Proceedings in SSI-104

Notice of Hearing, Scheduling Conference and Status Conferences

Notice of Unavailability of Counsel

Notice of Unavailability of Counsel – Rebecca Dempsey

Notice of Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals’ Order and Judgment Affirming District Court’s Denial of Appellants’ Motions to Intervene and Lift Stay

Order Setting a Deadline for the Filing of Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Order Granting US’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Filing Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Post-Trial (Motions, Orders, etc.) – Motions and Other

City of Las Cruces’ Response in Opposition to Renewed Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings and Brief in Support

United State’s Response in Support of Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings

SRGDCFA’s Response in Opposition to the Renewed Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings

SNM’s Response to Renewed Joint Motion of the City of El Paso and Amicus EP#1 to Stay Stream System Issue 104

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Response to Renewed Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings in SS-97-104 and Brief in Support

Renewed Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings and Brief in Support

Joint Motion to Set Oral Argument

Certificate of Service – Renewed Joint Mtn Stay

NMPG’s Response in Opposition to the Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings

Post-Trial (Motions, Orders, etc.) – Post-Trial Briefs

US, EBID, NMPG and SRGDCGA’s Post-Trial Brief

US, EBID, NMPG, SRGDCGA’ Joint Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

City of Las Cruces’ Post-Trial Brief in Support of 1906, 1908, and 1939 Priority Dates for the Rio Grande Project and Request for Oral Argument

State of New Mexico’s Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

City of El Paso and EPCWID1’s Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Relating to a Priority Date for the Rio Grande Project Right of the United States

City of EL Paso and EPCWID1’s Brief in Support of Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Relating to a Priority Date for the Rio Grande Project Right of the Unit

SNM’ Request for Oral Argument and Post-Trial Memorandum in Support of 1906, 1908 and 1939 as Priority Dates for the United States’ Rio Grande Project Right

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

City of Las Cruces’ Requested Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Notice of Hearing

SS-97-104; US Interest – Archives

Appeal Issues

Notice of Filing Docketing Statement (Pre-1906 Claimants) Docketing Statement attached-118 pgs total

Notice of Filing Motion to Limit Record Proper in Appeal of June18, 2014

Notice of Filing Motion to Limit Record Proper in Appeal No. 33,672 in NM COA

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Notice of Filing Motion to Amend Record Proper in COA #33,672

Notice of Appeal (Pre-1906 Claimants by Robert Simon)

Clerk’s Certificate

Notice of Appeal

Motion to Amend Record Proper (COA #33,672)

Mandate and Memorandum Opinion

Certificate of Costs from the County of Dona Ana in the State of NM

City of Las Cruces MSJ; resp; rep (date/amnts wtr)

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Consolidated Replies to the US, OSE, CLC, EBID’s, NMSU, EPCWID #1’s and Verde

EBID’s Response to All Pending Motions for Summary Judgment Re Amounts of Water & Priority dates

SNM’s Reply to EBID’s Response to All Pending Mtns for SJ

SNM’s Reply to US’ Consolidated Response in Opposition to the SNM’s and the CLC Motions

City of EL Paso’s Combined Response to the Motions for Summary Judgment on Project Priority and Amnt

SNM’s Reply to City of El Paso’s Combined Response to the MSJ on Project Priority and Amnts

EPCWID#1’s Response to City of Las Cruces’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Priority Date & Amounts

US’ Consolidated Response in Opposition to the State of New Mexico’s and City of Las Cruces Motions

City of Las Cruces’ Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment on Priority Date and Amounts

Stipulation Regarding Authenticity and Admissibility of Exhibit Documents

Darbyshire Response to all pending MSJ re; amnts of water

Reply of the SNM/CLC to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Response to the Mtns for SJ of the US, State, CLC

EBID’S Mtn for Leave to Reply to SNM’s Response re Mtns for SJ

NMPG’s Response to the City of Las Cruces’ Motion for Summary Judgment

City of Las Cruces’ Consolidated Reply to New Mexico Pecan Growers Response

City of Las Cruces’ Reply to City of El Paso’s Combined Response to MSJ

City of Las Cruces’ Reply to the US’ Consolidated Response in Opposition to the SNM and CLC Mtns

City of Las Cruces’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Priority Date and Amounts

Depositions

Notice of Deposition Duces Tecum – Esslinger

Notice to the SNM for Deposition Duces Tecum of NMRA Rule 1-030(b)6) Designated Person

Notice of Renewed Deposition Duces Tecum to Andrew H. Gahan

Notice of Deposition Duces Tecum to Neal W. Ackerly, Ph.D.

Notice of Deposition Duces Tecum to Andrew H. Gahan

Notice of Deposition Duces Tecum – Zach Libbin

Corrected Notice of Renewed Deposition Duces Tecum to Andrew H. Gahan

Certificate of Service-Gahan

Amended Notice of Deposition Duces Tecum to Andrew H. Gahan

Discovery Phase

Certificate of Service – Jack F. and Jean M. Darbyshire

Certificate of Service – NMPG’s Responses

Certificate of Service Regarding Stahmanns Inc.’s Responses to the SNM’s First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production

Notice of Service of US’ 3rd Set of Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Requests for Admission to the State of New Mexico

Certificate of Service – Notice of Errata

Amended Certificate of Service

Certifacte of Service – SNM’s First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production

Certificate of Service (City El Paso’s Answers to State’s First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production

Certificate of Service (SNM’s 2nd Set of Discovery to Pre-1906 Claimants)

Notice of Service of US’ Objections and Response to the SNM’s First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production to Defendant US

Certificate of Service – SNM Responds to 3rd Set of Discovery

Certificate of Service – SRGDCFA Responses

Certificate of Service – Verde Responses

Certificate of Service of EPNG’s Responses to State’s First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production

Certificate of Service of State’s Second Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production to Defendant United States

Certificate of Service Regarding EBID’s Responses to the SNM’s First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production

Certificate of Service (Pre1906)

Hearing Notices

Notice of Hearing- set for 4/1/2026 at 10am re Jaralosa RN-9702928

Notice of Mandatory Status Conference re RN-9702928 Jaralosa Cattle Company LLC- Filed June 18, 2024

Notice of Status Conference- CV-888 Filed 3-15-2024

Notice of Pre-Trial Conference (amended); set for 9-17-14 at 1:30 p.m.

Schedule of Hearings Regarding Pretrial Motions

Notice of Hearing Regarding Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Designate Expedited Inter Se Proceedings

Notice of Interim Pre-Trial Conference; 10-27-14

Amended Notice of Hearing; 3-7-14

Notice of Interim Pre-Trial Conference and Motion Hearing; 4-28-15

Notice of Interim Pre-Trial Conference; 4-27-15

Notice of Interim Pre-Trial Conference; 4-29-14

Amended Notice of Pre-Trial Conference

Notice of Motion Hearing; 4-29-14

Notice of Hearing SS-97-104; set for 10-24-13 @ 9:00 a.m.

Notice of Hearing-SS-97-104

Notice of Interim Pre-Trial Conference and Motion Hearing; 8-11-15

Notice of Hearing (Amended)

Notice of Hearing; 2-6-14

Miscellaneous (Notices, Withdraws, etc)

Notice of Unavailability of Counsel (Rebecca Dempsey)

Notice of Non-Availability (Reckard)

EBID-Notice of Unavailability

Defendant EBID’s Notice of WIthdrawal of Counsel and Designation of Counsel (Barncastle withdraws)

Motion for Judicial Estoppel / Mtn for Threshold Issue

United States’ Response in Opposition to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Reply in Support of their Motion for Threshold Issue

Response of Amicus Curiae EPCWID#1 in Opposition to Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Threshold Issue

US’ Motion for Continuance of Interim Pre-trial Conference and Motion Hearing

US’ Motion for Extension of the Deadlines for Filing Responses and Replies to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel

City of Las Cruces’ Response in Opposition to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel

US’ Notice of Withdrawal of Motion

SNM’s Response in Opposition to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Threshold Issue

Pre-1906 Claimants Motion for Threshold Issue

SNM’s Reply to the Responses of the US, EPCWID#1, and City of El Paso to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel

SNM’s Response to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel

City of El Paso’s Response in Opposition to Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel and Response in Opposition to Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Threshold Issue

Order Denying Pre-1906 Claimants’ February 28, 2015 Motion for Threshold Issue, and Establishing an Expedited Inter Se Proceeding on Representative Claims

Order Denying Pre-1906 Claimants’ Feburary 18, 2015 Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel

Response of Amicus Curiae EPCWID#1 in Opposition to Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel

EBID’ and the US’ Joint Response to Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Threshold Issue

Order on US’ Motion for One Week Extension of Filing Responses on Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel in Stream System Issue No. 104

Certificate of Service (SNM Responses to Pre-1906 Claimants Mtn Threshold/MtnJudicial Estoppel)

Motion to Dismiss; Responses and Replies

United States’ Consolidated Response to Motions to Dismiss

EBID’s Notice of Errata

NMPG’s Reply to the US and EBID’s Responses to NMPG’s Mtn Dismiss US Claim

NMSU’s Memorandum Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss the US’ Ownership Claims to Groundwater

Pre-1906 Claimants’ etal, Response to the US’ Mtn for Summary Judgment and Mtns to Dismiss Claims

City of Las Cruces’ Consolidated Reply to Responses to City of Las Cruces’ Mtn to Dismiss Claims

City of Las Cruces’ Motion to Dismiss and Limit Claims of the United State

SRGDCFA’s Motion to Dismiss US’ Claim to Rio Grande Project Water Rights

Verde’s Reply in Support of Mtn to Dismiss the US’ Claims to Groundwater as a Source of Water

City of El Paso’s Response to Motions to Dismiss

City of Las Cruces’ Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss and Limit Claims of the United States

Verde’s Mtn to Dismiss the US’ Claims to Groundwater as a Source of Water for the Rio Grande Project

Sammie Singh Sr., et al., as Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Dismiss All Claims by the US

SNM’s Consolidated Reply to US’ Response to SNM’s Mtn Dismiss the US’ Claims to Groundwater

SNM’s Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss the US’ Claims to Groundwater

SRGDCFA’s Response to Sammie Singh, Sr., et al’s Motion to Dismiss all Claims by the U.S.

EBID’s Response to All Dispositive Motions Re: the Source/Sources of Water for the Rio Grande Proj.

SNM’s Mtn to Dismiss the US’ Claims to Groundwater as a Source of Water for the Rio Grande Project

NMPG’s Motion to Dismiss the US’ Claim to Groundwater Rights in the Lower Rio Grande, and Its Brief

NMPG’s Response to Sammie Singh Sr., etal., Motion to Dismiss all Claims by the US

NMSU’s Motion to Dismiss the US’ Claim to Ownership of Groundwater

NMSU’s Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss the US’ Ownership Claims to Groundwater

EPNG’s Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss United States’ Claims to Groundwater

EPCWID #1’s Brief in Support of US’ Consolidated Resp to Mtns to Dismiss & Resp to SNM Mtn Preclude

EPNG’s Motion to Dismiss the United States’ Claims to Groundwater as a Source of Water

Motion to Stay Further Proceedings

Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings and Brief in Support

Consolidated Reply in Support of Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings (EP-EPCWID)

United States’ Response to Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings

Verde Realty, et al.’s Response to the City of El Paso’s Motion to Stay Proceedings

EBID’s Response to Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings and Brief in Support

Pre-1906 Claimants’ and Boyd Interest’s Reply in Support of Their Motion to Stay Proceedings SSI104

SNM’s Response to Order Denying Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Stay Further Proceeding in SS-97-104

City of Las Cruces’ Response in Opposition to Joint Motion to Stay and Brief in Support

SNM’s Response in Opposition to Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings

Certificate of Service – Consolidated Reply in Support of Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings

Certificate of Service – SNM Reply to EBID’s Response to Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings

Order Denying Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings in Stream System 104

SRGDCFA Response in Opposition to Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings

US and EBID’s Joint Response to Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Stay Further Proceedings in SSI-97-104

SNM’s Reply to US’ Response to Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings

SNM’s Response in Opposition to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Stay Further Proceedings

NMSU’s Response in Opposition to Joint Motion to Stay

Notice of Motion Hearing (re: City of El Paso and EPCWID’s Joint Motion to Stay)

Notice of Motion Hearing (re: Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Stay)

Order Denying Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Stay Further Proceedings in SS-97-104

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Stay Further Proceedings in SSI-97-104

Request for Setting on Motion to Stay Further Proceedings

SNM’s Reply to EBID’s Response to Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings

Notice of Completion of Briefing (Motion to Stay)

Motions in Limine

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Exhibits to the Response to the 8-27-15 US’ Motion in Limine

US’ Motion in Limine to Exclude Trial Evidence and Arguments that are Irrelevant and more Properly Relate to Issues Set for Hearing in SEparate Proceedings

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Response to the US’ Motion in Limine

SNM and CLC’ Response in Partial Support of the US’ Motion in Limine

Orders- SS-97-104 (before trial issues)

Order on US’ Motion for One Week Extension of Filing Responses on Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel in Stream System Issue No. 104

Order Granting in part the United States’ Motion in Limine to Exclude Trial Evidence and Arguments that are Irrelevant and/or More Properly Relate to Issues Set for Hearing in Separate Proceedings

Order Denying Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Stay Expedited Inter Se Proceeding Pending a Tenth Circuit Decision in James Scott Boyd, et al V. United States, et al, Case No. 15-002

Order Allowing Filing of Late Notice of Intent to Participate

Order Denying the SNM’s Motion to Preclude Additional Brief from EP#1

Order Designating Stream System Issue/Expedited Inter Se Proceeding No. 104, the United States Interests in hte Stream System

Order Extending Deadline in Stream System Issue 104

ORDER Granting EBID’s Motion for Extension of Time

Order Denying Pre-1906 Claimants’ February 28, 2015 Motion for Threshold Issue, and Establishing an Expedited Inter Se Proceeding on Representative Claims

Order Denying the SNM’s Motion to Preclude Reply From the City of El Paso

Order Granting the State’s Mtn to Dismiss the US’ Claims to Groundwater and Denying the US’ MSJ

Order Denying Pre-1906 Claimants’ Feburary 18, 2015 Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel

Order Denying Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Stay Further Proceedings in SS-97-104

Order (1) Granting SJ Re: Amnts; (2) Deny SJ Re: Priority; (3) Deny SJ to Pre-1906 Clmnts; Set Hrg

Order Denying Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings in Stream System Issue 104

Order Denying Motion to Continue Stay and Setting Initial Schedule fo Proceedings in Stream System Issue No. 104

Final Pretrial Order

Order Regarding Motion of EPCWID #1 to Make Filing in Stream System Issue 104

Notice of Supreme Court’s Order Appointing Special Master in No. 141, Orig., Texas v New Mexico, et al.

Order (US Motion to Continue Stay) GRANTED

Order Allowing Withdrawal and Substitution of Counsel

Order Amending Briefing Schedule for Dispositive Motions re: the Source or Sources of Water

Letter from Honorable James J. Wechsler dated August 27, 2015 = regarding Opening Statements

Notice of Judge Reassignment (Partial)

Scheduling Order Regarding Priority Date Proceedings

Amended Scheduling Order for Motions – SS-97-104 US Interest

Letter dated 08-17-15 from Honorable James J. Wechsler regarding three summary judgment motions which were filed on June 29, 2015

Order on US’ Motion for Extension of the Deadline for Filing Pre-Trial Motions

Proposed Order Grant SJ re: amnts; Deny SJ re: priority date; Denying SJ to Pre-1906; Set Sched Conf

Scheduling Order for Motions; SS-97-104 United States Interest

Scheduling Order Regarding Priority Date Proceedings – 3-12-14

Scheduling Order Regarding Priority Date Proceedings – 3-13-14

Scheduling Report

United States’ Motion for Extension of Time

Order

Order on US’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Replies to Responses to SJ Mtns

Order Taking Under Advisement Request to Lift Stay on Amicus Status for Lion’s Gate Water

Order Setting Breifing Schedule for Dispositive Motions Regarding the Source or Sources of Water for the United States’ Rio Grande Project

Order Regarding Motion of EPCWID No. 1 to Make Filing in Stream System Issue 104

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response and Reply Briefs to all Pre-trial Motions in Stream System Issue No. 104

Order on EBID’s Motion for Extension of the Deadlines for Filing Final Trial Exhibit List and Demonstrative Exhibits

Order Granting the State of New Mexico and City of Las Cruces’ June 29, 2015 Motion to Exclude Evidence

Order on Next Issues and Schedule for Litigation Regarding the US’ Rio Grande Project

Order on United State’s Motion for Extenson of Time to Reply to Responses Regarding State’s Offer of Judgment to Settle the US’ Rio Grande Project Water Rights

Order Granting Extension of Time

Order Granting Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Submit Trial Witness Lists, Expert Rebuttal Reports and to Disclose Rebuttal Witness Lists

Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to MSJ and Request to Set Stream Issue

Order Granting Motion to Strike

Order Granting the US’ Motion for Extension of Time

Order Granting Motion for Leave to File Notice of Intent to Participate in SS104

Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Motion of the City of El Paso and El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1’s Joint Motion to Stay

Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time Until January 12, 2015 to File Expert Reports

Pre-1906 Motion for Summary Judgment

City of Las Cruces’ Response and Memorandum in Opposition to Pre-1906 Claimants’ MSJ and Request

Pre-1906 Claimant’s Sammie Singh Sr., et al Reply to Responses to MSJ by Pecan Growers et al.

Order Denying Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Summary Judgment

Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Pre 1906 Claimants’ Motion for Summary Judgment

Pre-1906 Claimant’s Sammie Singh Sr., et al., Reply to the Responses to MSJ by NMSU et al

Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to MSJ and Request to Set Stream Issue

Motion for Summary Judgment and Request to Set Stream Issue to Adjudicate Pre 1906 Rights

City of El Paso’s Joinder in NMSU’s Response to Certain Pre-1906 Claimants’ MSJ & Request to set

SNM’s Response to Certain Pre-1906 Claimants’ MSJ and Request to Set Stream Issue

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Supplemental Exhibit List to Their Reply in Support of Their MSJ

Pre 1906 Claimants Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment

EBID and US’ Joint Response to Motion for SUmmary Judgment and Request to Set Stream Issue

NMSU’s Response to Certain Pre-1906 Claimants’ MSJ and Request to Set Stream Issue

City of Las Cruces and EBID’ Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to MSJ and Request to Set

Pre-1906 MSJ; Responses & Replies (date/amnts wtr)

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Summary Judgment Against the US Claims Under SSI 104

SRGDCFA Response to Summary Judgment Motions of the Pre-1906 Claimants, US, SNM and CLC

SNM’s Response in Opposition to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Summary Judgment Against the US

NMPG’ Response to Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Summary Judgment Against the U.S. Claims Under

EPCWID#1’s Response to Pre-1906 Motion for Summary Judgment against Claims Under SS104

Defendant EBID’s Motion for Leave to Reply to State of New Mexico’s Response Regarding MSJ

Darbyshire Response to all pending MSJ re: amnts of water

City of El Paso’s Combined Response to the Motions for Summary Judgment on Project Priority-Amnt

Pre-trial Motions, Responses and Replies

SRGDCFA’s Response in Opposition to the CLC’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that the US is Estopped from Obtaining a Pre-1906 Priority Date for the Rio Grande Project and Brief in Support Thereof

NMPG’s Response in Opposition to the City of Las Cruces’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that the US’ is Estopped from Obtaining a Pre-1906 Priority Date for the Rio Grande Project and Brief in Support

US’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support

Memorandum Brief of the SNM and the City of Las Cruces in Support of Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment on the Priority Dates of the USâ?? Rio Grande Project Right

EBID’s Response to SNM and CLC’ Joint Motion to Exclude Evidence Unrelated to the US’ Interests in the Rio Grande Project

Order Granting the State of New Mexico and City of Las Cruces’ June 29, 2015 Motion to Exclude Evidence

NMPG’s Response to SNM and CLC’ Joint Motion to Exclude Evidence Unrelated to the US’ Interests in the Rio Grande Project

NMPG’s Response in Opposition to the Renewed Motion of the SNM and CLC for Summary Judgment on the Priority Dates for the US’ Rio Grande Project Right and Memorandum in Support

NMPG’s Joinder in US’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support

Exhibits to the Memorandum Brief of the SNM and CLC in Support of Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment on the Priority Dates of the US’ Rio Grande Project Right

City of Las Cruces’ Reply to Responses Filed in Opposition to the City’s Motion For Partial Summary Judgment that the US is Estopped from Obtaining a Pre-1906 Priority Date

Letter from Honorable James J. Wechsler dated 8-17-15 regarding three summary judgment motions filed on 6-29-15

Addendum to Response in Opposition of the SNM and CLC to the US’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment

City of Las Cruces’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that the US is Estopped from Obtaining a Pre-1906 Priority Date for the Rio Grande Project and Brief in Support Thereof

EBID’s Response to Renewed Motion of the SNM and CLC for Summary Judgment on the Priority Dates of the US’ Rio Grande Project

EBID’s Joinder in US’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support

United States’ Response in Opposition to the City of Las Cruces’ Motino for Partial Summary Judgment that the US is Estopped from Obtaining a Pre-1906 Priority Date

City of El Paso’s Response in Opposition to the City of Las Cruces’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that the US is Estopped from Obtaining a Pre-1906 Priority Date

City of El Paso’s Joinder in US’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support

US’ Response in Opposition to the SNM and the CLC’ Memorandum in Support and Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment on the Priority Dates of the US’ Rio Grande Project

Reply of the SNM and the City of Las Cruces to the US’ Response in Opposition to the State of New Mexico and the City of Las Cruces’ Memorandum in Support and Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment on the Priority Dates of the US’ Rio Grande Project

SNM and CLC Memorandum in Support of Joint Motion to Exclude Evidence Unrelated to the US’ Interests in the Rio Grande Project

United States’ Reply to the State of New Mexico and the City of Las Cruces’ Response in Opposition to the United States’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment

Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response and Reply to All Pre-Trial Motions in SSI No. 104

US’ Motion for Extension of the Deadline for Filing Pre-Trial Motions

US’ Response in Opposition to the SNM and CLC’ Joint Motion and Memorandum in Support to Exclude Evidence Unrelated to the US’ Interests in the Rio Grande Project

State of New Mexico’s Response in Opposition to Motion to Designate Expedited Inter Se

SNM and City of Las Cruces’ Joint Motion to Exclude Evidence Unrelated to the US’ Interests in the Rio Grande Project

SRGDCFA’s Joinder in US’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support

SRGDCFA’ Response to the SNM and CLC’ Joint Motion to Exclude Evidence Unrelated to the US’ Interests in the Rio Grande Project

SRGDCFA’s Response in Opposition to the Renewed Motion of the SNM and CLC for Summary Judgment on the Priority Dates for the US’ Rio Grande Project Right and Memorandum in Support

Order on US’ Motion for Extension of hte Deadline for Filing Pre-Trial Motions

Renewed Motion of the SNM and the CLC for Summary Judgment on the Priority Dates of the US’ Rio Grande Project Right

Response in Opposition of the SNM and the CLC of the US’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Proposed Pre-trial Statements

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response adn Reply Briefs to all Pre-trial Motions in SSI No. 104

Reply of New Mexico and Las Cruces to the Responses of EBID, the United States, and Others, to the Motion to Exclude Evidence Unrelated to the US’ Interests in the Rio Grande Proje

Proposed Pretrial Statements of SNM and CLC

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Response to the SNM and CLC’ Motion to Exclude Evidence from Record and Summary Judgments and the US Summary Judgment on Priority Dates of the Federal Project

Memorandum Opinion and Order Addressing Pretrial Motions in SS-97-104

SNM MSJ; Responses and Replies (date/amnts wtr)

EBID’s Mtn for Leave to Reply and Reply State of New Mexico’s Response Re MSJ

SNM’s Reply to City of El Paso’s Combined Response to the MSJ on Project Priority and Amnt

City of Las Cruces’ Reply to the US’ Consolidated Response in Opposition to the SNM and CLC Mtns

City of EP’s Mtn for Leave to Reply and Reply to SNM’s Response in Opposition to US’ MSJ

City of Las Cruces’ Consolidated Reply to NMPGs’ Response to CLC’ MSJ and EBID’s Response to all

Darbyshire Response to all pending MSJ

SNM’s Certificationof Provenance of Exhibits to its Filings in Summary Judgment Proceeding

State of New Mexico’s Motion for Summary Judgment

SNM’s Reply to NMPGs and SRGDCFA’s Responses to its MSJ on the Amnts of Wtr and Priority Dates

State of New Mexico’s Notice of Supplemental Authority

City of EL Paso’s Combined Response to the Motions for Summary Judgment on Project Priority and Amnt

SNM’s Reply to US’ Consolidated Response in Opposition to the SNM’s and the CLC’ Motion

EPCWID#1’s Response to SNM’s MSJ on Amounts of Water and Priority Dates for US Project

SNM – Memo in Support of SNM Motion for Summary Judgment

Notice of Errata to SNM’s Certification of Provenance of Exhibits to its filings in Summary Jdgmnt

NMPG’s Response to the SNM’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the Amounts of Water and Priority Dates

Reply of the SNM and the CLC to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Response to the MSJ of US, State, CLC

Pre-1906 Claimants Comments on teh SNM’s Notice of Supplemental Authority

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Consolidated Replies to the US, OSE, CLC, EBID’s, NMSU, EPCWID #1’s and Verde

City of Las Cruces’ Reply to City of El Paso’s Combined Response to the Mtns for SJ

Statement of Issues

SNM’s Suggestions for, and Objections to, the Court’s Proposed Order of December 11, 2013

City of El Paso’s Suggestions and Objections to Proposed Order

Order (1) Granting SJ Re Amnts; (2) Deny SJ Re Priority; (3) Deny SJ to Pre-1906 Clmnts; Set Hrg

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Suggestions and Objections to Court’s Proposed Order

Proposed Order

Tentative Priority Date Schedule (submitted by OSE on 2-28-14)

United States’ Response to the Proposed Order

Verde’s Comments on Proposed Order

EPNGC’s Objection to the Court’s December 11, 2013, Proposed Order

EPCWID #1’S Suggestions and Objections to Proposed Order

Notice of Hearing (Amended)

Letter Tentative Priority Date Schedule-submitted by OSE (rec’ved 2-28-14)

City of Las Cruces’ Suggestions, Objections and Request for Reconsideration

EBID’s Suggestions and Objections

Joint Response to Request for Statement of the Issues Regarding the US’ Rio Grande Project

Order on Next Issues and Schedule for Litigation Regarding the United States’ Rio Grande Project

Request for Statement of Issues Regarding the United States’ Rio Grande Project

SNM’s Comments on the US’ and City of El Paso’s Joint Response to Request for Statement of the Issue

SNM’s Separate Report Stating Issues that can next be Addressed in Stream System Issue SS-97-104

SRGDCFA and NMPG’ Joint Response to Request for Statement of Issues Re: US’ Rights in Rio Grande

TELEPHONIC HEARING NOTICE – set for 10-10-12 @ 9:00 A.M.

US’ Statement Claim for Water for the Rio Grande Project

Notice of Appeal (Pre-1906 Claimants)

Suggestions/Objections to Proposed Order-12-11-13

SNM’s Suggestions for, and Objections to, the Court’s Proposed Order of December 11, 2013

City of El Paso’s Suggestions and Objections to Proposed Order

Verde’s Comments on Proposed Order

United States’ Response to the Proposed Order

Tentative Priority Date Schedule (submitted by OSE on 2-28-14)

Proposed Order

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Suggestions and Objections to Court’s Proposed Order

Order (1) Granting SJ Re Amnts; (2) Deny SJ Re Priority; (3) Deny SJ to Pre-1906 Clmnts; Set Hrg

EPNGC’s Objection to the Court’s December 11, 2013, Proposed Order

EPCWID #1’S Suggestions and Objections to Proposed Order

Notice of Hearing (Amended)

Letter Tentative Priority Date Schedule-submitted by OSE (rec’ved 2-28-14)

EBID’s Suggestions and Objections

City of Las Cruces’ Suggestions, Objections and Request for Reconsideration

Notice of Appeal (Pre-1906 Claimants)

Threshold Issue Comments

Verde’s Comments on the United States’ and State of New Mexico’s Separate Reports Re SS-97-104

United States’ Proposal Proposal for Threshold Issue RE State’s Subfile Offer of Judgment to Settle

SRGDCFA Comments re: the US’ and SNM’s Statements of Issue Pertaining to the US’ Claims to Groundwtr

SNM’s Separate Report on the Status of the Stmnt of Issues Pertaining to the US’ Claims to Groundwtr

SNM’s Reply to EBID’s Response to Dispositive Motions Re the Source of Water for the Rio Grande Proj

NMSU’s Comment Regarding State and US Proposals filed March 16, 2012

NMPG’s Comments RE: the US’ and SNM’s Statements of Issues Pertaining to the US’ Claims to Groundwtr

EPNGC’s Comment Regarding New Mexico’s and US’ Statement Of Issues filed March 16, 2012

Boyd Estate etal, as Pre1906 Claimants Comment to the OSE and US’ Proposal for the Threshold Issues

EBID’s Comments Re US’ Proposal for Threshold Issue Re State’s Subfile Offer of Judgment

CLC’ Comments in Support of State Engineer’s Report to the Court & Proposed Scheduling Order

City of El Paso’s and Amicus’ Comments re Statements of Issue

US MSJ; response; replies (date/amnt water)

State of New Mexico’s Response in Opposition to the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment

US’ Consolidated Reply to Responses filed to Motions in Support of Summary Judgment

City of El Paso’s Combined Response to the Motions for Summary Judgment on Project Priority & Amount

Certificate of Mailing (Order on US Mtn Extend Deadlines for Replies)

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Consolidated Reply to the US, OSE, CLC, EBID, NMSU, EPCWD1 and Verde

EPCWID No. 1’s Response to US Motion for Summary Judgment

Unopposed Mtn for Extension of Time to File Replies to Responses to Summary Judgment Mtns

Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of United States’ MSJ

SNM’s Mtn-Leave to File Sur-Reply to the City EP’s Reply to the SNM’s Response in Opp to US MSJ

SNM’s Mtn-Leave to File Sur-Reply to EBID’s Reply in Oppo to the State’s Reponse to US’ MSJ-SurReply

City of Las Cruces’ Reply to City of El Paso’s Combined Response to Mtns for SJ

NMSU’s Response to the US’ Motion for Summary Judgment

Order on US’ Unopposed Mtn for Extension of Time to File Replies to Responses to SJ Mtns

EBID’s Mtn for Leave to Reply and Reply SNM’s Response Regarding Mtns for Summary Judgment

El Paso Natural Gas Company’s Response in Opposition to the United States’ MSJ

NMPG’s Response to US’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Memo in Support

City of El Paso’s Motion for Leave to Reply and Reply to SNM’s Response in Opposition to US’ Motion

Darbyshire Trust’s Response to All Pending MSJ re: amnts and Priority

City of El Paso’s Motion for Leave to Reply and Reply to SNM’s Response in Opposition to US’ MSJ

City of Las Cruces’ Reply to City of El Paso’s Combined Response to the Motions for Summary Judgment

Verde’s Response to United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Response to SNM MSJ

SNM’s Reply to EBID’s Response to All Pending Motions for Summary Judgment

EBID’s Response to All Pending Motions for Summary Judgment RE; Amounts of Water & Priority Dates

SNM’s Reply to City of El Paso’s Combined Response to the MSJ on Project Priority and Amount

Stipulation Regarding Authenticity and Admissibility of Exhibit Documents

City of Las Cruces’ Response in Opposition to US MSJ

City of Las Cruces’ Consolidated Reply to NMPG’s Response to CLC’ MSJ and EBID’s Response to all

SRGDCFA’s Response to Summary Judgment Motions

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Response to the US, the NMOSE, and CLC’ MSJ

Order Granting Motions to File Additional Pleadings

US MSJ;Responses and Replies (source/sources wtr)

US’ Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (w-attachments)

Pre-1906 Claimants’ etal, Response to the US’ Mtn for Summary Judgment and Mtns to Dismiss Claims

Verde’s Response to the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment

CLC’s Joinder in SNM’s Motion to Preclude Reply Brief from City of El Paso on the US’ MSJ

EPNG’s Response to United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment

Motion for Extension of Time to File Summary Judgment Motions in Stream System Issue No. 104

United States’ Notice of Errata

Affidavit of Mark F. Sheridan in Support of EPNG’s Request for Rule 1-056(F) Relief

City of Las Cruces’ Response in Opposition to the US’ Motion for Summary Judgment

US’ Consolidated Reply to Responses to the US’ Motion for Summary Judgment

EPCWID #1’s Brief in Support of the US’ Motion for Summary Judgment

SNM’s Memorandum in Opposition to United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment

NMSU’s Response to the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment

SRGDCFA’s Response to US’ Motion for Summary Judgment

Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment

City of EP’s Response in Opposition to State’s Mtn to Preclude Reply Brief from City EL on US’ MSJ

CLC’s Notice of Joinder in SNM’s Motion to Preclude Additional Brief from EP#1 on the US’ MSJ

SNM’ Motion to Preclude Additional Brief from EP#1 on the US’ Motion for Summary Judgment

SNM’s Motion to Preclude Reply Brief from City of El Paso on US’ Motion for Summary Judgment

SNM’s Motion to Strike Response of Certain Pre-1906 Claimants to US MJS

Stahmanns Inc.’s Notice of Joinder in NMPG’ Response to the US’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Memo

City of EP’s Reply in Support of US’ Motion for Summary Judgment

United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment

Witness and Exhibit Lists

Order Granting EBID’S Motion for Extension of the Deadlines for Filing Final Trial Exhibit List and Demonstrative Exhibits

New Mexico State University’s Expert Witness List

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Expert Witness List

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Designation of Fact Witnesses

Order Granting Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Submit Trial Witness Lists, Expert Rebuttal Reports and to Disclose Rebuttal Witness Lists

Objections of the SNM and the CLC to the Proposed Exhibit and Witness Lists of the Participating Parties in SSI 104, US Priority Date

NMPG’s Supplemental Final Trial and Demonstrative Exhibits List

EBID’s Disclosure and Identification of Expert Witness

Clarified Objections of the SNM and the CLC to the Proposed Exhibit and Witness Lists of the Participating Parties in SSI 104, United States Priority Date

City of Las Cruces’ Rebuttal Witness List

Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time Until January 12, 2015 to File Expert Reports

United States’ Objections to the SNM, CLC, and Pre-1906 Claimants’ Exhibit Lists and Expert Reports

EBID’s Final Trial Exhibit and Demonstrative Exhibit List

EBID’s Objection to Pre-1906 Claimants’, SNM, and City of Las Cruces’ Exhibit Lists

Motion to Extend Time for Filing Pre-1906 Claimants’ Expert Report

New Mexico Pecan Growers’ Trial Witness List

NMPG’s Final Trial and Demonstrative Exhibits List

State of New Mexico and City of Las Cruces Trial Exhibit List

Elephante Butte Irrigation District’s Witness List

Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Submit Trial Witness Lists, Expert Rebuttal Reports and to Disclose Rebuttal Witness Lists

Defendants’ Pre-1906 Claimants’ Trial Exhibit List

EBID’s Motion for Extension of the Deadlines for Filing Final Trial Exhibit Lists and Demonstrative Exhibits

Certificate of Service – CLC’ Statement of Opinion of Eluid L. Martinez

Certificate of Service of Expert Historian Report

City of El Paso’s Final Trial Exhibit List

City of Las Cruces’ Expert Witness List

United States’ List of Trial Exhibits

Certificate of Service – RE: Expert Report by Dr. Neal Ackerly for EBID

State of New Mexico’s Response in Opposition to Amended Motion to Extend Time for Filing Pre-1906 Claimants’ Expert’s Report

State of New Mexico Expert Witness List

Amended Motion to Extend Time for Filing Pre-1906 Claimants’ Expert’s Report

SRGDCFA’s Expert Witness List

SRGDCFA’s Final Trial and Demonstrative Exhibits List

State of New Mexico Rebuttal Witness List

United States’ Disclosure and Identification of Expert Witness

United States’ Disclosure of Rebuttal Witness List

Pre-1906 Claimants’ First Amended Expert Witness List

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Second Amended Expert WItness List

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Withdrawal of Designation of Expert Witness

Southern Rio Grande Diversified Crop Farmers Association’s Trial Witness List

SRGDCFA’S AMENDED EXPERT WITNESS LIST

Schedule of Hearings Regarding Pretrial Motions